<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pastor's Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimkang.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:16:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church Reformed and Always Reforming by Shaun Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-church-reformed-and-always-reforming/#comment-5946</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-5946</guid>
		<description>This is true.  Thanks my brother for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true.  Thanks my brother for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church Reformed and Always Reforming by Phil Siefkes</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-church-reformed-and-always-reforming/#comment-5945</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Siefkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-5945</guid>
		<description>Perhaps another reason for &quot;always reforming&quot; (and maybe assumed in your two observations) would be that as our understanding of God and His Word changes, we are then in need to tweak/reform what we do and how/why we do things.
Thanks for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps another reason for &#8220;always reforming&#8221; (and maybe assumed in your two observations) would be that as our understanding of God and His Word changes, we are then in need to tweak/reform what we do and how/why we do things.<br />
Thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church Reformed and Always Reforming by Shaun Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-church-reformed-and-always-reforming/#comment-5944</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-5944</guid>
		<description>My only response is that I was caught up for a moment with ecstatic tongues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only response is that I was caught up for a moment with ecstatic tongues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church Reformed and Always Reforming by Rich Bargas</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/the-church-reformed-and-always-reforming/#comment-5943</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Bargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=989#comment-5943</guid>
		<description>Throwin&#039; down the Latin...nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throwin&#8217; down the Latin&#8230;nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on J.C. Ryle on Deathbed Confession by Erik</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/jc-ryle-on-deathbed-confession/#comment-5942</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=653#comment-5942</guid>
		<description>Jim,

Just thought you might enjoy some &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; Christ-centered, gospel-saturated Ryle quotes at my site:

http://jcrylequotes.com/

Be encouraged and strengthened in your faith as Ryle continually points you to our Savior Jesus Christ.

Keep up the insightful posts.

&lt;em&gt;Soli Deo Gloria!&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://kowalker.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;~ Erik&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>Just thought you might enjoy some <em>more</em> Christ-centered, gospel-saturated Ryle quotes at my site:</p>
<p><a href="http://jcrylequotes.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jcrylequotes.com/</a></p>
<p>Be encouraged and strengthened in your faith as Ryle continually points you to our Savior Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>Keep up the insightful posts.</p>
<p><em>Soli Deo Gloria!</em></p>
<p><a href="http://kowalker.com/" rel="nofollow">~ Erik</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ministering in Small Churches and/or in Small Towns by Rich Bargas</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/ministering-in-small-churches-andor-in-small-towns/#comment-5940</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Bargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-5940</guid>
		<description>Might I add a quote from B.B. Warfield on this subject? In his address, &quot;Religious Life of Theological Students,&quot; Warfield said:

&quot;Say what you will, do what you will, the ministry is a “learned profession”; and the man without learning, no matter with what other gifts he may be endowed, is unfit for its duties. “Apt to teach”—yes, the minister must be “apt to teach.” Not apt merely to exhort, to beseech, to appeal, to entreat; not even merely, to testify, to bear witness;but to teach. And teaching implies knowledge: he who teaches must know. But aptness to teach alone does not make a minister; nor is it his primary qualification. It is only one of a long list of requirements which Paul lays down as necessary to meet in him who aspires to this high office. And all the rest concern, not his intellectual, but his spiritual fitness. A minister must be learned,on pain of being utterly incompetent for his work. But before and above being learned, a minister must be godly.Nothing could be more fatal, however, than to set these two things over against one another. Recruiting officers do not dispute whether it is better for soldiers to have a right leg or a left leg: soldiers should have both legs. Sometimes we hear it said that ten minutes on you knees will give you a truer, deeper, more operative knowledge of God than ten hours over your books. “What!” is the appropriate response, “than then hours over your books, on your knees?” Why should you turn from God when you turn to your books, or feel that you must turn from your books in order to turn to God? That I am asked to speak to you on the religious life of the student of theology proceeds on the recognition of the absurdity of such antithesis. You are students of theology, it is understood that you are religious men. In your case there can be no“either—or” here—either a student or a man of God. You must be both. Religion does not take a man away from his work; it sends him to his work with an added quality of devotion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might I add a quote from B.B. Warfield on this subject? In his address, &#8220;Religious Life of Theological Students,&#8221; Warfield said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Say what you will, do what you will, the ministry is a “learned profession”; and the man without learning, no matter with what other gifts he may be endowed, is unfit for its duties. “Apt to teach”—yes, the minister must be “apt to teach.” Not apt merely to exhort, to beseech, to appeal, to entreat; not even merely, to testify, to bear witness;but to teach. And teaching implies knowledge: he who teaches must know. But aptness to teach alone does not make a minister; nor is it his primary qualification. It is only one of a long list of requirements which Paul lays down as necessary to meet in him who aspires to this high office. And all the rest concern, not his intellectual, but his spiritual fitness. A minister must be learned,on pain of being utterly incompetent for his work. But before and above being learned, a minister must be godly.Nothing could be more fatal, however, than to set these two things over against one another. Recruiting officers do not dispute whether it is better for soldiers to have a right leg or a left leg: soldiers should have both legs. Sometimes we hear it said that ten minutes on you knees will give you a truer, deeper, more operative knowledge of God than ten hours over your books. “What!” is the appropriate response, “than then hours over your books, on your knees?” Why should you turn from God when you turn to your books, or feel that you must turn from your books in order to turn to God? That I am asked to speak to you on the religious life of the student of theology proceeds on the recognition of the absurdity of such antithesis. You are students of theology, it is understood that you are religious men. In your case there can be no“either—or” here—either a student or a man of God. You must be both. Religion does not take a man away from his work; it sends him to his work with an added quality of devotion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ministering in Small Churches and/or in Small Towns by Jim Kang</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/ministering-in-small-churches-andor-in-small-towns/#comment-5939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-5939</guid>
		<description>There are men in church history that God used who had no seminary training. I think of Spurgeon, Moody, Lloyd-Jones, and others. However, you&#039;re no Spurgeon, neither am I. Although I don&#039;t believe that seminary training is prerequisite to preach, I do not belittle its importance. 

While there is a danger of pride in boasting about one&#039;s academic degree(s), it is equally prideful to think of one&#039;s self to be self-sufficient because he is self-educated. Seminary degree(s) may seem nothing to some people, however, it does mean that an individual has sacrificed/invested a portion of his life to sit under his teachers (whom he may sometimes disagree with) for rigorous training academically and spiritually (though like Calvin, I don&#039;t see the two as contradictions). In a nutshell, seminary training offers tools for people to enhance their call to preach and pastor. To me, that&#039;s priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are men in church history that God used who had no seminary training. I think of Spurgeon, Moody, Lloyd-Jones, and others. However, you&#8217;re no Spurgeon, neither am I. Although I don&#8217;t believe that seminary training is prerequisite to preach, I do not belittle its importance. </p>
<p>While there is a danger of pride in boasting about one&#8217;s academic degree(s), it is equally prideful to think of one&#8217;s self to be self-sufficient because he is self-educated. Seminary degree(s) may seem nothing to some people, however, it does mean that an individual has sacrificed/invested a portion of his life to sit under his teachers (whom he may sometimes disagree with) for rigorous training academically and spiritually (though like Calvin, I don&#8217;t see the two as contradictions). In a nutshell, seminary training offers tools for people to enhance their call to preach and pastor. To me, that&#8217;s priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ministering in Small Churches and/or in Small Towns by Vince Williams</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/06/26/ministering-in-small-churches-andor-in-small-towns/#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=831#comment-5938</guid>
		<description>It appears that you believe that all Pastor&#039;s are in need of seminary training before they can Pastor. I hope I misunderstood that. But just in case, that opinion within itself is unbiblical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that you believe that all Pastor&#8217;s are in need of seminary training before they can Pastor. I hope I misunderstood that. But just in case, that opinion within itself is unbiblical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Does It Mean To Be Reformed? by Jim Kang</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/what-does-it-mean-to-be-reformed/#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-5937</guid>
		<description>Great point Rich, especially, your last point - i.e., preaching Calvinist doctrine but practicing Arminian philosophy of ministry. Talk about inconsistency.

On a different note, your point about the Regulative Principle of Worship is something I&#039;ve been reading/studying/thinking for the past few years, and it is something l would love for us (contributors) to discuss/write in near future to sharpen each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Rich, especially, your last point &#8211; i.e., preaching Calvinist doctrine but practicing Arminian philosophy of ministry. Talk about inconsistency.</p>
<p>On a different note, your point about the Regulative Principle of Worship is something I&#8217;ve been reading/studying/thinking for the past few years, and it is something l would love for us (contributors) to discuss/write in near future to sharpen each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Does It Mean To Be Reformed? by Rich Bargas</title>
		<link>http://jimkang.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/what-does-it-mean-to-be-reformed/#comment-5936</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Bargas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimkang.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-5936</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these thoughts Jim. I agree with you. The reformation should not be left in the past as a mere historical specimen, but should continue to refine our current thinking and practices to become more biblical. It is our duty to cling to sola Scriptura so that we excise from our hearts and our churches any vestiges of error that we can find that are out of sync with that Sacred Book. 
Why is it so important? Why does it matter that we not only have right doctrine BUT ALSO right practices (the regulative principle)? I think you hit the nail on the head--because the thrice holy God we serve has the right to demand not only that we worship Him, but that we do so in the way that He prescribes. 
That is why it is difficult to swallow that some call themselves Reformed or Calvinists while they dabble in worldliness and the need to appeal to gimmicks and trends. How can someone preach Calvinist doctrine while practice Arminian philosophy in their ministry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these thoughts Jim. I agree with you. The reformation should not be left in the past as a mere historical specimen, but should continue to refine our current thinking and practices to become more biblical. It is our duty to cling to sola Scriptura so that we excise from our hearts and our churches any vestiges of error that we can find that are out of sync with that Sacred Book.<br />
Why is it so important? Why does it matter that we not only have right doctrine BUT ALSO right practices (the regulative principle)? I think you hit the nail on the head&#8211;because the thrice holy God we serve has the right to demand not only that we worship Him, but that we do so in the way that He prescribes.<br />
That is why it is difficult to swallow that some call themselves Reformed or Calvinists while they dabble in worldliness and the need to appeal to gimmicks and trends. How can someone preach Calvinist doctrine while practice Arminian philosophy in their ministry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
